[Kripke’s] most important philosophical accomplishment is in the way he posed and clarified the questions, and not in the particular answers that he gave to him.
Robert Stalnaker, “Reference and Necessity”
Stalnaker On Kripke
BTemplates.com
-
Once we have arrived at a conclusion that is well supported by reasons, we use arguments to explain and defend it. A good argument doesn...
-
But in spite of its [i.e. Principia Mathematica ] shortcomings I think that no one who reads this book will dispute its main contention, na...
-
For my part I do, qua lay physicist, believe in physical objects and not in Homer’s gods; and I consider it a scientific error to believe o...
Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.
-
▼
2016
(20)
-
▼
August
(15)
- Hand On Understanding
- Weston On Arguments
- Stalnaker On Kripke
- Schwartz On Kripke
- How is Pure Mathematics Possible
- Russell On Wittgenstein
- Quine On Empiricism
- Wittgenstein On Language
- Grice On Philosophy
- Moore On the Business of Philosophers
- Rorty On Analytic Philosophy
- 論理性
- Priest On the Say-so of Experts
- Wittgenstein On Calculi Containing Contradictions
- Haack On Old Deferentialists and New Cynics
-
▼
August
(15)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(20)
-
▼
August
(15)
- Haack On Old Deferentialists and New Cynics
- Wittgenstein On Calculi Containing Contradictions
- Priest On the Say-so of Experts
- 論理性
- Rorty On Analytic Philosophy
- Moore On the Business of Philosophers
- Grice On Philosophy
- Wittgenstein On Language
- Quine On Empiricism
- Russell On Wittgenstein
- How is Pure Mathematics Possible
- Schwartz On Kripke
- Stalnaker On Kripke
- Weston On Arguments
- Hand On Understanding
-
▼
August
(15)
0 comments:
Post a Comment